A Well-Made Shintō Wakizashi Signed “Echizen no Fujiwara Sukehiro”

This wakizashi is a fine example of Shintō-era craftsmanship, bearing the signature “Echizen no Fujiwara Sukehiro.” The sword shows many of the hallmarks typical of mid- to late-17th century blades: a balanced sugata, clear hada, and a well-defined hamon that together speak to the skill of its maker and the enduring aesthetics of the period.  The sword shows careful forging and a balanced shape typical of Shintō-period wakizashi, suggesting it was crafted for practical use as well as aesthetic appeal. Although it bears two very tiny kizu (small flaws), these do not significantly detract from its overall integrity or visual impact. Rather, they add to its historical character, reminding us that such blades often saw real service.

The name “Echizen no Fujiwara Sukehiro” suggests a smith who either worked in Echizen province or held honorary title there. While Sukehiro is a fairly well-known name among Shintō smiths—particularly associated with the Osaka Shintō school—the Echizen designation implies either lineage, influence, or patronage in that province. Blades from this school often display a graceful curvature and strong nioi-guchi, reflecting the blending of practical martial requirements with the refined taste of the Edo period.

However, it is important to note that this particular blade has not yet been papered by a recognized shinsa (authentication) organization. The absence of NBTHK or NTHK papers means the signature’s authenticity remains uncertain. Submission to shinsa would not only clarify the legitimacy of the mei (signature) but also contribute to a better understanding of the blade’s place in the history of Japanese swordsmithing.

In summary, this wakizashi stands out for its evident quality and signed attribution, but only after formal appraisal can one know if it truly carries the hand of “Echizen no Sukehiro.

This blade is presently valued as mumei (unsigned). Should the mei be judged non-genuine, it may be removed, after which the sword would be eligible for resubmission to shinsa. In such cases, the blade would be evaluated on its own merits and could achieve proper attribution under NBTHK appraisal.